I use the PCI four times yearly on my "showcase" sports fields.
STMA’s Playing Conditions Index revisited
It’s been several years now since the Sports Turf Managers Association unveiled the Playing Conditions Index (PCI). I still believe this is one of the most valuable tools that the organization has given to us.
How many of you reading this article know what the PCI is? How many of you that do know are using it? Hopefully, all of you know what it is and are using it.
I was fortunate to be on the committee that developed the PCI. The PCI’s original intent was to be used as a way to evaluate your sports field and provide a ready reference as to its current condition. It has, for me, become more than that.
I use the PCI for field evaluation; however, I take it a few steps further. I use the PCI four times yearly on my “show case” sports fields; four should be a minimum. I not only answer the questions honestly but my PCI is a road map for the maintenance and renovations I perform on my sports fields. My PCI is full of notes. The notes include weather conditions, type of products used, pest identification, weed identification, percentage of field that was renovated, exact area of the field that was renovation and results of the renovation. Why? What I have found by using the PCI is it isn’t just a simple tool to evaluate the current playing condition of the field. Using the PCI evaluation along with the notes I write down on the PCI gives me the overall picture and history of that particular sports field.
Whatever you do, do not toss your old PCI’s in the trash! I use my old PCI’s and compare them to the new; weather conditions jotted down now provide me with an historical look at the weather conditions. Weather plays a major role in what we do, soil temps, air temps, rain or drought all contribute to the safety, playability and aesthetic quality of our sports fields. Weather may affect the pesticides or herbicide we select to control a fungus or weed infestation problem. By comparing past PCI’s with the present I can know determine what products worked, what renovation practiced worked and I can now make educated management practices and budget decisions based on the information I obtained from the PCI.
What’s on the horizon? At STMA’s National Conference in Orlando 2 years ago, I had the pleasure of meeting Ian Lacy, who is with the Institute of Groundsmanship in the United Kingdom. We became friends while discussing the PCI and the United Kingdom’s Performance Quality Standards (PQS). Ian and I picked up our friendship again in Austin this past January and soon began talking about the PCI and the PQS and where both of these valuable tools are headed.
We agreed to beginning looking at both documents to see if they could be merged to become one. Imagine having a document that meets the needs of Sports Turf Managers around the world! I have begun to look at developing a database for the information collected on my PCI’s so that it would be readily available for applying management practices, budget and board meetings and for media releases. I am also hopeful that the database can then be merged with the use of a specific sports field. Merging these two data bases may provide valuable information into the management practices used vs. the sport or sports that is played on them. There is work to be done in the future to hone this tool into what it really can be, maybe the most valuable one we have in our tool box.
There are three things I don’t leave my office without when evaluating my sports fields: the PCI, my maintenance standards and a passion for what I do.
Mike Tarantino is director of maintenance and operations for Poway (CA) School District, and an STMA board member representing Schools K-12.