As with any sick patient understanding what is wrong and getting a complete diagnosis is essential if real health is going to be achieved. This axiom works not only with human health but also soil and plant health and at no time in recent history have we seen the cost of health care or plant care skyrocket like we are seeing today.
Amending a sick field? Start with blood work
The never ending increase in basic fertility costs has put a tremendous strain on every turf manager’s budget, and is forcing unparalleled changes in the way our industry goes to business. At the same time demands for quality, environmental pressures and use are all up. These demands are forcing us all to find ways to reduce inputs while trying to maintain our jobs, the quality of our fields, and the safety the public expects.
Many of these demands are sending turf managers back to school to rethink old practices and tune up their knowledge of the basics; one of the most important is the basic soil test.
For more than 25 years I have studied soil tests. This year more than 10,000 will go across my desk from turf sites all over the world. Many of these sites have been evaluated yearly for as many as 15 years. Soil testing data is powerful research information and it has allowed many turf grass managers to discover ways in which to renovate a tired field without going to costly extremes.
Today, more than ever, understanding what your soil needs is not only prudent but is becoming a necessity. Soil testing, however, is still a mystery to most of us as it was to me as a young County Extension Agent coming out of college. I would look at the hundreds of soil tests and feel nothing but frustration in my lack of understanding. I see that same frustration in the eyes of many turf grass managers because soil testing can be confusing, but it is our basic blood work and by understanding what is wrong we can make significant changes in the way the soil works and in the way the plant responds.
By getting the soil right we can help to open the soil physically, allowing more air and water to move through the soil profile, this improves drainage, creates checks and balances for pathogens, better mobilizes nutrients, improves recovery and reduces fertility inputs.
Amending a field must start with a complete soil test but unfortunately many of the tests available today are not very complete and simply add to the confusion. Many tests are given away for free and are free for a reason—because they are little more than pH readings. This lack of data makes it very difficult to amend a field appropriately.
A quality soil test will list the CEC showing how much nutrient the soil can hold, a clay soil being much bigger than sand based soils. It will also list all the basic anions (negatively charged elements) and cations (positively charged elements) and ideally show the desired levels of calcium, magnesium and potassium the three nutrients that make up 85% of the soils base saturation. A complete base saturation (the percentage of the cations on the soil colloid) should be listed that will include calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, trace elements and hydrogen.
Too many soil tests show a partial percentage list of these important cations but will average the shortened list and still come up with what appears to be a complete percentage. Remember percentage refers to 100%; base saturation numbers should always add up to 100%, if they are more or less you know you are not dealing with a complete base saturation. Or, if one of the six cations is not listed you are not dealing with a complete base saturation.
In this magazine’s May 2005 issue, we chronicled the experiences of Bob Studholme, from the Fairfax County (VA) Parks Authority. When Bob started testing all 275 of his fields with Logan Labs from Ohio (www.loganlabs.com) he focused on balancing his soils; subsequently he noticed his soils draining better, recovering better and his cost of fertility went down significantly. Bob worked at bringing his calcium levels between 60% and 70%, magnesium between 12% and 17% the level of potassium close to 5%, and he always tried to maintain hydrogen levels at 10% because on his complete soil test, 10% hydrogen would always give him a pH of 6.3. That number is generally recognized as the “ideal” pH because it is the point at which there is maximum potential mobility of both the macro and micro nutrients.
The focus of any good soils program should always include a chemical, a physical and a biological approach. This is the old “three legged stool” diagram that can be found in any good soil science book, all three need to be equal or the stool falls over. Chemistry affects physics which in turn affects biology and it is ultimately soil biology that makes everything in the soil work.
With a better environment for biology, which can be established with good soil testing, we can build better levels of humus in the soil. Turfgrass managers are quickly realizing that as they build a carbon based program they are reducing inputs and saving their budgets. All of this starts with chemistry (the soil test) which is our first limiting factor. In fact a good soil test may actually be only 50% fertility the rest being physics and biology. So then why do we spend so much of time with only pH and the basic three nutrients?
On recent work done on a soccer field we found the soil to be very imbalanced. The calcium base saturation was 45% and the magnesium base saturation was also in the 40% range. This left very little room of other cations such as hydrogen and in fact the percentage of hydrogen was 0% which meant the pH was above 7.0.
Since the base saturation percentages always add up to 100% we knew that by adding calcium in the form of high calcium limestone (dolomitic lime would have added unwanted magnesium) we would knock the magnesium off the soil colloid and open the soil up just enough to get air and water through the soil profile. This also allowed some hydrogen (acidity) to take hold on the soil colloid lowering the soil pH a phenomenon that we have documented hundreds of times on sports fields all across the country. This soil showed a high CEC so it took a few years but just as Bob Studholme reported on his fields, we again saw the field open up and drainage improve. The most important nutrient in turf has always been oxygen and the best way to get oxygen into the rootzone is to amend the soil appropriately based on good soil testing and following the advice of that blood work.
When amending a field or building next year’s program the best investment that you can make is to be sure you know exactly what your soil is telling you and the only way to do that is to sample the soil with a quality soil testing laboratory. The soil report will tell you how to amend you soils for maximum performance, for maximum recovery and for a reduction of inputs.
There are numbers of good consultants in our industry who understand how to read a complete base saturation soil test and can be of great assistance in helping you discover what direction to take your program for maximum performance. When followed through with properly, I have never seen an investment in good soil testing not pay for itself many times over.
Joel Simmons is an agronomist in Easton, PA. He has worked as a Penn State County Extension Agent and a soils instructor at Rutgers University. Joel owns Soil First Consulting and can be reached at email@example.com.